Episode 29. September 27 2019 CLP Topic Category: Democrat Police State Socialism Title: When Does William Barr Strike Back Against the Democrat’s Lynching of Trump?

Episode 29. September 27 2019

CLP Topic Category: Democrat Police State Socialism

Title: When Does William Barr Strike Back Against the Democrat’s Lynching of Trump?

Our podcast today connects Nancy Pelosi’s authorization of impeachment to the larger issue of how a totalitarian socialist regime enforces the truth by eliminating its enemies.

For Democrats, the official version of truth is the politically correct truth that socialism is better than free market capitalism and that globalism is better than national sovereignty.

A totalitarian regime does not have any separation between the media, law enforcement, the agencies of government, or the political machinery, in promoting the official version of the truth.

In other words, to compel obedience to the truth, the official truth requires a unified, consolidated, Democrat police state.

Heretics who refuse to embrace the official truth are put in prison or killed by the socialist elites. Professor Stephen Kotkin wrote in The Wall Street Journal that communism killed at least 65 million people between 1917 and 2017.

The U.N. report on Venezuela estimates that Maduro has killed 7,000 political opponents.

The American socialist Democrats are not different than Maduro, and impeachment is a moral equivalent of lynching Trump because Trump does not embrace the truth of the socialist religion.

If the Democrats are willing to weaponize Congress in order to assassinate a President, then the Democrats are capable of taking the next step to mass murder citizens, who they consider to be deplorable.

In order to make a contrast between a totalitarian regime and a democratic republic, this podcast asks the question: when is William Barr going to strike back against the Democrat’s weaponization of Congress to lynch Trump?

In other words, after 8 years of Obama’s lawless regime, and after 2 years of AOC’s socialism, after 3 years of the Mueller investigation, after Pelosi’s call for impeachment, when does Barr counter-attack the totalitarian socialist Democrats?

Hillary is still walking around scot free of her racketeering crimes, now calling for the impeachment of her enemy. Comey, and the FBI, are unindicted for their crimes of sedition. Omar is free of prosecution for her fraud on immigration. Biden, and his son, have not been prosecuted for defrauding the taxpayers with their Ukrainian deals.

And, Obama has not been touched, by Barr, for the crime of treason in unleashing the agents of government to overthrow the Trump administration.

Thus far, William Barr has refused to enforce the American rule of law against the Democrats, by claiming that he is “handicapped” because of the on-going IG investigation.

Barr now has the IG report and still delays in striking back. In the absence of his prosecution, there is no challenge to Pelosi’s totalitarian effort to impeach Trump.

Our podcast raises the possible outcome that Barr will choose to do nothing to indict and prosecute the Democrats for their attempted coup, and their total weaponization of Congress to kill a President.

Barr may be a closet agent of the deep state.

If Barr chooses to protect the FBI and DOJ, rather than prosecute, the only logical conclusion for Trump loyalist is that there is no longer any prospect for the defense of American individual liberty, or any hope for the American government.

Because of Madison’s flaw of leaving citizens defenseless in the representative republic, the only ability of citizens to strike back against the socialists is to wait a year to vote.

Madison’s representative republic died from neglect by the Republicans, who never defended individual liberty from Obama and Pelosi.

It is time to admit that the American representative republic ended in failure, with the lynching of President Trump, and move on to a better, more democratic representative republic.

The best response to Barr’s inaction, and to the Democrat’s weaponization of Congress, is the creation of a new political party that leads the 63 million Trump loyalists to a new democratic representative nation.

The right person to lead that national movement is Lou Dobbs.

I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the copyrighted Citizen Liberty Party News Network podcast for September 27, 2019.

Our podcast today is under the CLP topic category Democrat Police State Socialism, and is titled, When Does William Barr Strike Back?

The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.

Totalitarian Globalism.

Recently, Bill Weld, a Republican running for president against President Trump, suggested that Trump has committed treason, by conducting foreign policy with Ukraine, and should be put to death.

Weld stated,

“That’s not just undermining democratic institutions. That is treason. It’s treason, pure and simple, and the penalty for treason under the U.S. code is death.”

Weld is a globalist Republican and believes in the corporate crony capitalist globalist vision.

The common philosophy of Republicans and Democrats is their shared belief that a one-world government is better than individual sovereign nations.

George Herbert Bush called this idea the “new world order.”

In a totalitarian globalist world order, there is no consent of the governed because individual citizens do not vote.

After Weld made his allegation, there was no push-back from the National Republican Committee. Nor, was there any comment from Bill Barr that Weld’s allegation of treason is absurd.

Weld, like many Republicans, promotes the Democrat’s version of truth, which requires that Trump be put to death.

Weld “reaches-across-the-aisle” to support the Democrat’s attempt to put Trump to death for the treason of Making America Great.

The weaponization of government by the Democrats will eventually lead to them using government to enforce mass incarceration, or mass murder, of political opponents, as is currently the case in Venezuela.

The Democrats initiated their civil war in the Obama regime, when Obama weaponized the IRS to target opponents who did not believe in global socialism.

Senator Chuck Schumer proposed that the IRS target political groups that did not embrace the socialist vision of the Democrats. In 2012, Schumer sent a letter to the IRS demanding that they begin a terrorist operation against conservatives.

Schumer stated,

“…there are many things that can be done administratively by the IRS and other government agencies — we must redouble those efforts immediately.”

This use of of the IRS is the first step down the 3 steps of the slippery slope to mass murder by the Democrats.

First, the Democrats take your guns, so citizens are defenseless against the agents of the police state. For example, Beto said “Hell yes, we will take your guns.”

Second, they will take your liberties, the most recent example is Mueller’s distortion of innocent until proven guilty, to guilty before the fact.

And third, as Maduro has demonstrated, if you refuse to accept their totalitarian truth, they will kill you. Pelosi is using Congress to lynch a President, the moral equivalent of killing him.

The Democrat’s end game, like all other socialist regimes, is to move from killing Trump, to mass murder of political enemies in order to eliminate opposition to their totalitarian globalist world order.

Justice Delayed. Justice Denied.

Barr hides behind a political nicety by claiming he must delay the equal application of justice because the IG report is still in process.

Victor Davis Hanson pointed out the two standards of equality before the law by describing Mueller’s treatment of Trump loyalists.

The point Hanson is making is that if there was only one standard of justice, then Barr would apply that universal standard to the Democrats.

On the other hand, if there are two standards of justice, Barr refuses to indict Hillary, and Hillary walks free.

Hanson uses the example of Mueller’s treatment of Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI. Mueller emphasized that even the appearance of false testimony is felonious behavior.

Hanson writes that if there is only one standard of justice,

“Then the DOJ will probably have to charge former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe with perjury or related offenses. A report from the Office of the Inspector General indicates that McCabe lied at least four times to federal investigators.”

Hanson notes that, if there is only one standard of justice, that Barr would apply Mueller’s standard of justice to Former FBI director James Comey.

Hanson writes,

“Comey may also have lied to Congress when he testified that he had not written his report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal before interviewing Clinton. Former director of national intelligence James Clapper and former CIA director John Brennan lied under oath to Congress on matters related to surveillance.”

After Barr obtained the report about Comey from Inspector General Horowitz, Barr declined to refer Comey for prosecution because although DOJ prosecutors believed the evidence was compelling, Barr didn’t consider it sufficient to prove that Comey “intentionally” violated the law.

This excuse of “intentionality” is the same excuse given by Comey for not prosecuting Hillary on her email server crime.

Hanson concludes his article by noting that there are two standards of justice, one for socialists who embrace the socialist version of the truth, and the other for everyone else.

Hanson writes,

“The more Mueller searches for hypothetical lawbreaking, the more he is inadvertently underscoring that actual lawbreakers must be subject to the same standard of justice. Ironically, Mueller’s investigation has reminded America that it is past time to call Comey, McCabe, and a host of Obama-era DOJ and FBI officials to account.”

Rush Limbaugh asks: When can Trump loyalists expect Barr to strike back?

Limbaugh states,

“Since when did ‘guilty until proven innocent’ become a legal standard in the United States system of jurisprudence? There is evidence — abundant evidence — of criminal behavior and criminal activity all over the investigator side of this. So who is going to conduct this reckoning? Who is going to investigate Mueller? If there is no reckoning in the justice system, where does such a reckoning happen? And the last place that I can see a reckoning happen would be at the ballot box. It would have to be a ballot box reckoning.”

Limbaugh’s flaccid advice to Trump loyalists is to wait a year, and then, continue voting for crony capitalist, globalist, Republicans.

Limbaugh states,

“The Democrats are going to have to lose elections if this reckoning is to ever happen, if this is to ever get rectified.”

The flaw in Limbaugh’s analysis is that after Trump leaves office, either vertically or horizontally, the Democrats and Republicans will continue to collude on implementing a totalitarian globalist state.

A more permanent solution to totalitarianism is needed, and that solution is a new constitution and a new nation, led by a new political party.

The Democratic Republic of America.

Madison’s constitution ended in centralized tyranny because it allowed political elites to use Congress to lynch a president.

Madison feared “the people,” and denied them constitutional authority to protect their liberties, or to protect President Trump.

Madison’s constitution left the citizens defenseless, totally dependent on William Barr to enforce the law.

Barr may not act to enforce the law. He may instead choose to protect the FBI and DOJ from prosecution.

In January, of 2019, Barr stated that the IG’s investigation into whether the FBI abused the surveillance court process during the Russia probe will be completed by May or June.

Then, he pushed back the date until September, claiming that he and Huber could not do anything until they got the IG report.

Sessions knew when he appointed Huber, in 2017, that Huber could not do anything until after the IG report was issued.

In other words, Huber did nothing for over 2 years, all the while defrauding the American public that he was conducting his investigation.

The IG report is simply an excuse for Barr to continue the protection racket for the FBI and DOJ. Barr got the IG report in September and declined to prosecute Comey.

During Robert Mueller’s Congressional hearing, Barr praised FBI Director Christopher Wray and the FBI line agents, stressing that the attempted coup involved “a few people in the upper echelons of the Bureau and the DOJ.”

Barr is channeling Omar about 9/11, that a few upper echelon people did some things.

A better idea than depending on an insider elite like Barr, to protect liberty, is the creation of a democratic representative republic, based upon the framework of state sovereignty of the Articles of Confederation, where citizens have direct political authority to counter-attack the Democrat socialists.

In the new Democratic Republic of America, citizens would have an iron-clad God-given right to own, and use, an AR-15, to defend their liberties from totalitarian socialists, who are quite willing to use the agents of government to compel obedience to their totalitarian religion.

I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this podcast is a copyrighted production of the Citizen Liberty Party News Network.

You can subscribe to all of the audio and text of our podcasts, for $30 per year, at our website.

You can join the political movement to create a natural rights republic and contribute our mission at CLPnewsnetwork.com

You can learn more about the Democratic Republic of America at GABBYpress.com

Thank you for joining me today and please visit our entire archive of podcasts at clpnewsnetwork.com.